? did she get in a car accident or something? Or is it more mundane then taht... *worry*
Don't woorry, I just took the train home ;)
@ heileen : ooooooh pretty dress ! Evil temptress ! (et à propos de mon livre, la robe bleue n'est pas coulissée sur des rubans, c'est un velours imprimé à carreaux... donc tu avais raison)
In fact, i mentionned a Poe event for the bicentennary of his birth, and costumes could be in the time-span of his life-span (indeed), that is 1809 (and not 1909) and 1849.
sorry for making you worry about green_martha : I just forget that "gone" could have such a double meaning in english. (In french too, in fact, but it is a very old-fashionned way to say it...)
Ah. d'accord. Then I have misunderstood you. Still - my sister and I are planning on a Belle-Epoque 1910 Sortie next year, she's never been to Paris yet :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 05:48 pm (UTC)From:btw, very very pretty dress! but I don't think it's 1873 looks more late 1890s early 1900s to me...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 07:38 pm (UTC)From:be well,
tessalina
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 08:00 pm (UTC)From:Don't woorry, I just took the train home ;)
@
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 08:03 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 08:05 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 08:40 am (UTC)From:Didn't you mention a 1909 sortie next year?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-28 06:16 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-28 06:18 pm (UTC)From:sorry for making you worry about
no subject
Date: 2008-02-28 07:36 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 10:33 am (UTC)From: